Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
risk:detailed_exposure:risk_chile [2015/12/24 15:44]
Matias Hube
risk:detailed_exposure:risk_chile [2016/04/21 10:26] (current)
Catalina Yepes [Reposition costs]
Line 1: Line 1:
-**//​__...page under construction ​...__//**+**//​__...page under review ​...__//**
  
 ====== Exposure Model for Chile====== ====== Exposure Model for Chile======
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 ^  Typology number ​ ^  Description ​ ^  GEM Taxonomy ​ ^ ^  Typology number ​ ^  Description ​ ^  GEM Taxonomy ​ ^
-|1|Reinforced concrete, 1-3 story houses|CR/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​3/​RES+RES1| +  |Reinforced concrete, 1-3 story houses|CR/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​3/​RES+RES1| 
-|2|Reinforced concrete, 3-9 story buildings|CR/​LWAL/​HBET:​3,​9/​RES+RES2| +  |Reinforced concrete, 3-9 story buildings|CR/​LWAL/​HBET:​3,​9/​RES+RES2| 
-|3|Reinforced concrete, 10-24 story buildings|CR/​LWAL/​HBET:​10,​24/​RES+RES2| +  |Reinforced concrete, 10-24 story buildings|CR/​LWAL/​HBET:​10,​24/​RES+RES2| 
-|4|Reinforced concrete, 25 or more story buildings|CR/​LWAL/​HBET:​25,​40/​RES+RES2| +  |Reinforced concrete, 25 or more story buildings|CR/​LWAL/​HBET:​25,​40/​RES+RES2| 
-|5|Unreinforced clay brick masonry, 1-2 story houses|MUR+CLBRS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1| +  |Unreinforced clay brick masonry, 1-2 story houses|MUR+CLBRS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1| 
-|6|Reinforced clay brick masonry, 1-2 story houses|MR+CLBRH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1| +  |Reinforced clay brick masonry, 1-2 story houses|MR+CLBRH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1| 
-|7|Reinforced clay brick masonry, 3 story buildings|MR+CLBRH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HEX:​3/​RES+RES2| +  |Reinforced clay brick masonry, 3 story buildings|MR+CLBRH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HEX:​3/​RES+RES2| 
-|8|Reinforced clay brick masonry, 4-5 story buildings|MR+CLBRH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​4,​5/​RES+RES2| +  |Reinforced clay brick masonry, 4-5 story buildings|MR+CLBRH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​4,​5/​RES+RES2| 
-|9|Confined clay brick masonry, 1-2 story houses|MCF+CLBRS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1|+  |Confined clay brick masonry, 1-2 story houses|MCF+CLBRS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1|
 |:::​|:::​|MCF+CLBRH+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1| |:::​|:::​|MCF+CLBRH+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1|
-|10|Confined clay brick masonry, 3 story buildings|MCF+CLBRS+MOC/​LWAL/​HEX:​3/​RES+RES2|+ 10  |Confined clay brick masonry, 3 story buildings|MCF+CLBRS+MOC/​LWAL/​HEX:​3/​RES+RES2|
 |:::​|:::​|MCF+CLBRH+MOC/​LWAL/​HEX:​3/​RES+RES2| |:::​|:::​|MCF+CLBRH+MOC/​LWAL/​HEX:​3/​RES+RES2|
-|11|Confined clay brick masonry, 4-5 story buildings|MCF+CLBRS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​4,​5/​RES+RES2|+ 11  |Confined clay brick masonry, 4-5 story buildings|MCF+CLBRS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​4,​5/​RES+RES2|
 |:::​|:::​|MCF+CLBRH+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​4,​5/​RES+RES2| |:::​|:::​|MCF+CLBRH+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​4,​5/​RES+RES2|
-|12|Reinforced or confined concrete block masonry, 1-2 story houses|MCF+CBH+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1|+ 12  |Reinforced or confined concrete block masonry, 1-2 story houses|MCF+CBH+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1|
 |:::​|:::​|MR+CBH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1| |:::​|:::​|MR+CBH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1|
-|13|Reinforced or confined concrete block masonry, 3 story buildings|MCF+CBH+MOC/​LWAL/​HEX:​3/​RES+RES2|+ 13  |Reinforced or confined concrete block masonry, 3 story buildings|MCF+CBH+MOC/​LWAL/​HEX:​3/​RES+RES2|
 |:::​|:::​|MR+CBH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HEX:​3/​RES+RES2| |:::​|:::​|MR+CBH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HEX:​3/​RES+RES2|
-|14|Reinforced or confined concrete block masonry, 4-5 story buildings|MCF+CBH+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​4,​5/​RES+RES2|+ 14  |Reinforced or confined concrete block masonry, 4-5 story buildings|MCF+CBH+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​4,​5/​RES+RES2|
 |:::​|:::​|MR+CBH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​4,​5/​RES+RES2| |:::​|:::​|MR+CBH+RS+MOC/​LWAL/​HBET:​4,​5/​RES+RES2|
-|15|Timber houses|W/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​3/​RES+RES1| + 15  |Timber houses|W/​LWAL/​HBET:​1,​3/​RES+RES1| 
-|16|Emergency houses|W/​LWAL+DNO/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES| + 16  |Emergency houses|W/​LWAL+DNO/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES| 
-|17|Adobe houses|MUR+ADO+MOM/​LWAL+DNO/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1| + 17  |Adobe houses|MUR+ADO+MOM/​LWAL+DNO/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES1| 
-|18|Informal or self-construction housing|MATO/​LWAL+DNO/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES6|+ 18  |Informal or self-construction housing|MATO/​LWAL+DNO/​HBET:​1,​2/​RES+RES6|
  
 To access to the complete report of the Exposure Model for Chile called //Exposure Model: Buildings typology distribution at the census block level and replacement costs// click in the following link: To access to the complete report of the Exposure Model for Chile called //Exposure Model: Buildings typology distribution at the census block level and replacement costs// click in the following link:
Line 133: Line 133:
 The average floor area for structures of each typology was estimated using UESF data for each commune, because census data does not provide information on floor areas of dwellings. For multi-story buildings, the average floor area considers the built area of all stories. For emergency timber houses, and for informal houses an average floor area is not estimated because the total cost of these structures are estimated directly with the number of structures. The average floor area for structures of each typology was estimated using UESF data for each commune, because census data does not provide information on floor areas of dwellings. For multi-story buildings, the average floor area considers the built area of all stories. For emergency timber houses, and for informal houses an average floor area is not estimated because the total cost of these structures are estimated directly with the number of structures.
  
-====Reposition ​costs per typology====+====Replacement ​costs per typology====
  
 Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (MINVU) defines the costs per unit of area for five quality categories of residential structures: from superior to inferior. Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (MINVU) defines the costs per unit of area for five quality categories of residential structures: from superior to inferior.
  
-For the National Exposure Model, it is not possible to calculate the category for each structure based on any of the statistical data used. Typical structures were considered for the main building materials (reinforced concrete, masonry, timber and adobe), and it was possible to establish the best and worst qualities for each type of structure with its reposition ​costs related.+For the National Exposure Model, it is not possible to calculate the category for each structure based on any of the statistical data used. Typical structures were considered for the main building materials (reinforced concrete, masonry, timber and adobe), and it was possible to establish the best and worst qualities for each type of structure with its replacement ​costs related.
  
-As the communes in the whole country does not have the same reposition ​costs, it is necessary to differentiate costs between them. The Internal Revenue Service (SII) has information of base appraisal values for residential structures with the same five categories than MINVU. This base appraisal value is modified by four factors dependent on the structure’s location, special conditions of the structure, depreciation,​ and a commercial coefficient applicable to structures built in commercial zones. The factor that depends on the structure’s location is assigned for each commune, from 1.0 to 0.4. To estimate the replacement cost of structures in each commune, the cost associated to best quality of construction was assumed for structures in communes with factor 1.0, and the cost associated to worst quality of construction was assumed in communes with factor 0.4. For other communes, the replacement cost is extrapolated according to its factor.+As the communes in the whole country does not have the same replacement ​costs, it is necessary to differentiate costs between them. The Internal Revenue Service (SII) has information of base appraisal values for residential structures with the same five categories than MINVU. This base appraisal value is modified by four factors dependent on the structure’s location, special conditions of the structure, depreciation,​ and a commercial coefficient applicable to structures built in commercial zones. The factor that depends on the structure’s location is assigned for each commune, from 1.0 to 0.4. To estimate the replacement cost of structures in each commune, the cost associated to best quality of construction was assumed for structures in communes with factor 1.0, and the cost associated to worst quality of construction was assumed in communes with factor 0.4. For other communes, the replacement cost is extrapolated according to its factor.
  
 Replacement cost for emergency and informal houses are not defined by MINVU. Then, it was assumed to be the same as the construction cost of a new emergency house: an average of USD 1,280. Replacement costs for informal houses are considered the same as for emergency houses because after an earthquake, damaged informal houses would be replaced with emergency houses by the authorities or helping institutions. Replacement cost for emergency and informal houses are not defined by MINVU. Then, it was assumed to be the same as the construction cost of a new emergency house: an average of USD 1,280. Replacement costs for informal houses are considered the same as for emergency houses because after an earthquake, damaged informal houses would be replaced with emergency houses by the authorities or helping institutions.
Line 174: Line 174:
 [[national_exp_model_chile_surface| here]] [[national_exp_model_chile_surface| here]]
  
-====Reposition ​costs==== +====Replacement ​costs==== 
-More than **108 billion USD** corresponds to the total reposition ​cost for all the residential structures in Chile. The participation of the reposition ​cost per typology is:+More than **108 billion USD** corresponds to the total replacement ​cost for all the residential structures in Chile. The participation of the replacement ​cost per typology is:
  
 {{ :​risk:​detailed_exposure:​chile_costo_total_tipologias.png?​800 |}} {{ :​risk:​detailed_exposure:​chile_costo_total_tipologias.png?​800 |}}
  
-To see more detailed information about the reposition ​costs per typology click+To see more detailed information about the replacement ​costs per typology click
 [[national_exp_model_chile_costs| here]] [[national_exp_model_chile_costs| here]]
  
Line 186: Line 186:
 ======Detailed Exposure Model====== ======Detailed Exposure Model======
  
 +In this section, the methodology used to build the Detailed Exposure Model for three representative cities from three different macro-regions in Chile, and the results of this model are presented.
 =====Methodology===== =====Methodology=====
 +
 +This section describes the methodology used to obtain a Detailed Exposure Model for three cities (urban zones of three communes) in Chile using digital remote surveying, similar to a residential housing census, to count and classify structures using the 18 typologies of the Exposure Model. The three cities were chosen to be representative of three macro-regions of Chile: Iquique for the Great North of the country, Rancagua for Central Zone, and Osorno for the Southern Zone. 
 +
 +The city Iquique, located in the Iquique commune is the capital of the I Region of Tarapacá, and is located in the coastal plain at latitude 20.22°S, almost 1,800 km north of Santiago. The commune of Iquique has a total surface of 2,262 km2 and 196,437 inhabitants (SINIM, 2015).
 +
 +Rancagua is the main city and capital of the VI Region of Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins;​ it is located in the central valley at latitude 34.17°S, approximately 85 km south of Santiago. It is located in the commune of Rancagua, one of the most important and most populated communes in Central Chile. In 2014, the commune had 232,639 inhabitants and a surface of 260 km2 (SINIM, 2015).
 +
 +Osorno is the second most important city in the X Region of Los Lagos, and is located at latitude 40.57°S, more than 800 km south of Santiago. It is located in the commune of Osorno, which by 2014 had 157,389 inhabitants and a surface of 951 km2.
 +
 +The following figure shows the location of the cities of Iquique, Santiago, Rancagua, and Osorno in a map of Chile.
  
 {{:​risk:​detailed_exposure:​chile_mapa_tres_ciudades.png?​600 |}} {{:​risk:​detailed_exposure:​chile_mapa_tres_ciudades.png?​600 |}}
  • risk/detailed_exposure/risk_chile.1450968282.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2015/12/24 15:44
  • by Matias Hube