Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
whe_example_short [2017/04/18 10:26]
Catalina Yepes [3. Building Construction Process]
whe_example_short [2017/04/18 10:45]
Catalina Yepes [5. Earthquake Performance During Past Earthquakes]
Line 56: Line 56:
  
 **3.3 Explain unit construction cost:** 56.19 CUC/m2 **3.3 Explain unit construction cost:** 56.19 CUC/m2
-per m2 of built-up area expressed using a currency used in the region, and, if possible, an equivalent amount in $US in the brackets e.g. 200 Rs/m2 (5 $US/m2) (When calculating the conversion between local currency and U.S. dollars, please use the market rate if it is different from the official rate))+ 
 +//per m2 of built-up area expressed using a currency used in the region, and, if possible, an equivalent amount in $US in the brackets e.g. 200 Rs/m2 (5 $US/m2) (When calculating the conversion between local currency and U.S. dollars, please use the market rate if it is different from the official rate))// 
 + 
 +==== 4. Socio-Economic Issues ==== 
 +---- 
 +**4.1 Typical number of inhabitants?​** 
 +  * Day: >20 
 +  * Night: >20 
 + 
 +**4.2 Economic Level of Inhabitants*:​** Low-income class (poor) 
 + 
 +//*Below are the general guidelines related to the economic status of the inhabitants//​ 
 +  * Very Poor = lowest 10% of the population (per GDP) 
 +  * Poor = lowest 30% of the population 
 +  * Middle Class = from the lowest 30% up to the top 20% of the population 
 +  * Rich = top 20% of the population 
 + 
 +**4.3 Is earthquake insurance for this construction type typically available?​** No 
 + 
 +==== 5. Earthquake Performance During Past Earthquakes ==== 
 +---- 
 +**5.1 Damage patterns observed in past earthquakes for this construction type:** Unknown damage 
 + 
 +**5.2 Seismic Deficiency: Structural System** (Frames, walls, etc.) Unknown deficiencies 
 + 
 +**5.3 Seismic Deficiency: Foundation** Unknown deficiencies 
 + 
 +**5.4 Seismic Vulnerability Rating:** 
 + 
 +Prior to filling out the information required in the table below, please read the Guidelines here: 
 + 
 +[[http://​www.world-housing.net/​wp-content/​uploads/​2015/​06/​Seismic-Vulnerability-Rating.pdf]] 
 + 
 +^                              ^  High Vulnerability\\ (Very poor seismic performance) ​ ^     ​^ ​ Medium Vulnerability ​ ^      ^     ​^ ​ Low Vulnerability\\ (Excellent seismic performance) ​ ^ 
 +^                              ^  A                                                     ​^ ​ B  ^  C                     ​^ ​ D   ​^ ​ E  ^  F                                                    ^ 
 +| Seismic Vulnerability Class  |                                                        |     ​| ​                       |  -l  |  o  |                                                       | 
 + 
 +//** Notes:​**//​ 
 + 
 +  * o = Expected seismic vulnerability class 
 +  * |- =Probable vulnerability range –lower bound 
 +  * -| =Probable vulnerability range-upper bound 
 +//Once you have determined the seismic vulnerability class for this construction type, copy the above symbols: o, |-, and -| as appropriate and place them into the table.// 
 + 
 +  * **Additional comments** (e.g. explain how this vulnerability rating was assigned) Low to moderate vulnerability 
 + 
 +--- 
 + 
 +=== Appendix 1: General Information Images === 
 + 
 +=== Appendix 2: References === 
 + 
 +=== Appendix 3: Authors === 
 + 
 +=== Appendix 4: Reviewer === 
 + 
 +**Reviewer 1: Jaiswal, Kishor** 
 +  * Title: Research Structural Engineer 
 +  * Affiliation:​ U.S. Geological Survey (contracted through Synergetics Incorporated) 
 +  * Location: Golden CO, USA  
 +  * Email: kjaiswal@usgs.gov 
 + 
 + 
 +**PAGER-STR (Jaiswal and Wald 2008):** S5 
 + 
 +//For more information regarding the PAGER-STR number, see 
 +[[http://​www.world-housing.net/​wp-content/​uploads/​2015/​07/​Jaiswal_Wald_2008_14WCEE_PAGER_Inventory.pdf]]//​ 
 + 
 + 
 +**GEM Tax-T (Brzav et al. 2012):** S+S99/​LFBR/​RC+RC1/​FC+FC1/​H:​5/​ 
 + 
 +//For more information regarding the PAGER-STR number, see 
 +[[http://​www.world-housing.net/​wp-content/​uploads/​2012/​12/​BuildingTaxonomyV2_Overview-INTERIM.pdf]]//​
  • whe_example_short.txt
  • Last modified: 2017/04/18 10:45
  • by Catalina Yepes