Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
whe_example_short [2017/04/18 10:10] Catalina Yepes |
whe_example_short [2017/04/18 10:45] (current) Catalina Yepes [5. Earthquake Performance During Past Earthquakes] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ==== 1. World Housing Type ==== | ==== 1. World Housing Type ==== | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| **1.1 Building type:** VH | **1.1 Building type:** VH | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
| ==== 2. Structural Features ==== | ==== 2. Structural Features ==== | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | **2.1 Typical Number of Stories:** 5 | ||
| + | **2.2 Plan Shape:** Rectangular, solid | ||
| + | |||
| + | **2.3 Type of Structural System: Steel: Braced frame:** Concentric connections in all panels | ||
| + | |||
| + | //**Additional comments on structural system:**// Moment-resisting steel-braced frames | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **2.3.1 Gravity load-bearing systems:** The floor system, transferring the gravity loads to the beams and columns and finally to the footings | ||
| + | * **2.3.2 Lateral load-resisting systems:** Steel-braced frames provide the lateral resistance | ||
| + | * **2.4 Type of infill wall material:** Hollow concrete blocks, sandwich panels or rectangular fired clay bricks | ||
| + | * **2.5 Type of Foundation:** Shallow Foundation: Mat foundation | ||
| + | * **2.6 Type of Floor System:** Cast-in-place beamless reinforced concrete floor | ||
| + | * **//Additional comments on floor system://** Cast-in-situ flat slabs | ||
| + | * **2.7 Type of Roof System and Roofing Material:** Cast-in-place beamless reinforced concrete roof | ||
| + | * **//Additional comments on roof system://** Cast-in-situ flat slabs | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 3. Building Construction Process ==== | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | **3.1 Is this construction type addressed by codes/standards?** Yes | ||
| + | * //If yes, provide the title of the code or standard and the year when the first code/standard addressing this type of construction had been issued? Include any applicable codes:// NC 46:2014"Construcciones sismorresistentes. Requisitos para el diseño y construcción" | ||
| + | |||
| + | **3.2 Are building permits required?** | ||
| + | |||
| + | **3.3 Explain unit construction cost:** 56.19 CUC/m2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | //per m2 of built-up area expressed using a currency used in the region, and, if possible, an equivalent amount in $US in the brackets e.g. 200 Rs/m2 (5 $US/m2) (When calculating the conversion between local currency and U.S. dollars, please use the market rate if it is different from the official rate))// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 4. Socio-Economic Issues ==== | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | **4.1 Typical number of inhabitants?** | ||
| + | * Day: >20 | ||
| + | * Night: >20 | ||
| + | |||
| + | **4.2 Economic Level of Inhabitants*:** Low-income class (poor) | ||
| + | |||
| + | //*Below are the general guidelines related to the economic status of the inhabitants// | ||
| + | * Very Poor = lowest 10% of the population (per GDP) | ||
| + | * Poor = lowest 30% of the population | ||
| + | * Middle Class = from the lowest 30% up to the top 20% of the population | ||
| + | * Rich = top 20% of the population | ||
| + | |||
| + | **4.3 Is earthquake insurance for this construction type typically available?** No | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 5. Earthquake Performance During Past Earthquakes ==== | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | **5.1 Damage patterns observed in past earthquakes for this construction type:** Unknown damage | ||
| + | |||
| + | **5.2 Seismic Deficiency: Structural System** (Frames, walls, etc.) Unknown deficiencies | ||
| + | |||
| + | **5.3 Seismic Deficiency: Foundation** Unknown deficiencies | ||
| + | |||
| + | **5.4 Seismic Vulnerability Rating:** | ||
| + | |||
| + | Prior to filling out the information required in the table below, please read the Guidelines here: | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[http://www.world-housing.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Seismic-Vulnerability-Rating.pdf]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ ^ High Vulnerability\\ (Very poor seismic performance) ^ ^ Medium Vulnerability ^ ^ ^ Low Vulnerability\\ (Excellent seismic performance) ^ | ||
| + | ^ ^ A ^ B ^ C ^ D ^ E ^ F ^ | ||
| + | | Seismic Vulnerability Class | | | | -l | o | | | ||
| + | |||
| + | //** Notes:**// | ||
| + | |||
| + | * o = Expected seismic vulnerability class | ||
| + | * |- =Probable vulnerability range –lower bound | ||
| + | * -| =Probable vulnerability range-upper bound | ||
| + | //Once you have determined the seismic vulnerability class for this construction type, copy the above symbols: o, |-, and -| as appropriate and place them into the table.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Additional comments** (e.g. explain how this vulnerability rating was assigned) Low to moderate vulnerability | ||
| + | |||
| + | --- | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Appendix 1: General Information Images === | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Appendix 2: References === | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Appendix 3: Authors === | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Appendix 4: Reviewer === | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Reviewer 1: Jaiswal, Kishor** | ||
| + | * Title: Research Structural Engineer | ||
| + | * Affiliation: U.S. Geological Survey (contracted through Synergetics Incorporated) | ||
| + | * Location: Golden CO, USA | ||
| + | * Email: kjaiswal@usgs.gov | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **PAGER-STR (Jaiswal and Wald 2008):** S5 | ||
| + | |||
| + | //For more information regarding the PAGER-STR number, see | ||
| + | [[http://www.world-housing.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Jaiswal_Wald_2008_14WCEE_PAGER_Inventory.pdf]]// | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **GEM Tax-T (Brzav et al. 2012):** S+S99/LFBR/RC+RC1/FC+FC1/H:5/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | //For more information regarding the PAGER-STR number, see | ||
| + | [[http://www.world-housing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/BuildingTaxonomyV2_Overview-INTERIM.pdf]]// | ||